The distinction between the unsolicited kisses in McDonald, supra, and the unsolicited hug in the present case turns upon this question of intent. This cause is before us on petition for writ of certiorari to review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Spivey v. Battaglia, Fla.App., 242 So.2d 477 (1971). Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest. The distinction between the unsolicited kisses in McDonald, supra, and the unsolicited hug in the present case turns upon this question of intent. Where a reasonable man would believe that a particular result was substantially certain to follow, he will be held in the eyes of the law as though he had intended it. Class 3 - Spivey v. Battaglia. Get free access to the complete judgment in SPIVEY v. BATTAGLIA FRUIT COMPANY on CaseMine. The settled law is that a defendant becomes liable for reasonably foreseeable consequences, though the exact results and damages were not contemplated. Even an unsolicited hug is viewed as a tort under the law. Case Name Citation Court Audio; Li v. Yellow Cab Co. of California: 532 P.2d 1226: Supreme Court of California, 1975: Download: Tarasoff v. Regents of University of California Respondent, Mr. Battaglia, filed his answer raising as a defense the claim that his "friendly unsolicited hug" was an assault and battery as a matter of law and was barred by the running of the two-year statute of limitations on assault and battery. In case of any confusion, feel free to reach out to us.Leave your message here. 2d 815, 1972 Fla. Facts --Petitioner… Gray v. The case falls within our definition, "unexpected injury received in the ordinary performance of a duty in the usual manner is an injury `by accident' within the purview of the Workmen's Compensation Law, without the showing of anything fortuitous." Spivey v. Battaglia, 258 So.2d 815 (Fla. 1972). Spivey v. Battaglia Fruit Company, 138 So. Herrin v. Sutherland Case Brief - Rule of Law: Interference with the airspace over one's property can give rise to an action for trespass. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Hill Case Brief - Rule of Law: For assault to occur, there must be an intentional and unlawful offer or attempt to touch Every Bundle … John M. Cain, of Gurney, Gurney Handley, Orlando, for petitioners. It will be seen below that there is a misapplication and therefore conflict with McDonald v. Ford, Fla.App., 223 So.2d 553 (2d DCA Fla.1969), vesting jurisdiction 1. D knew P to be very shy. Before confirming, please ensure that you have thoroughly read and verified the judgment. This is a rational conclusion in view of the struggling involved there. Respondent, Mr. Battaglia, filed his answer raising as a defense the claim that his "friendly unsolicited hug" was an assault and battery as a matter of law and was barred by the running of the two-year statute of limitations on assault … 2007) United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, 2007: Download Spivey v. Battaglia 258 So.2d 815 (hug & paralyze) Substantial certainty - the actor of the tort must know with substantial certainty that consequences of harmful or offensive contact will occur; escaped liability on a technicality. P suffered a sharp pain in the back of the neck and ear. Acts that might be considered prudent in one case might be negligent in another. In the latter case, the intent is legally implied and becomes an assault rather than unintentional negligence. It would thus be an assault (intentional). "). Opinion for Spivey v. Battaglia, 258 So. However, the knowledge and appreciation of a risk, short of substantial certainty, is not the equivalent of intent. Case Name, Citation Number, Author Spivey v. Battaglia 258 So. 241 (wolf dog) The trial judge committed error when he granted summary final judgment in favor of the defendant. This cause is before us on petition for writ of certiorari to review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Spivey v. Battaglia, Fla. 20 Petitioner suffered a sharp pain, followed by paralysis on the left side of her face, after Respondent put his arm around her in a "friendly, unsolicited hug." The Fifth District’s Decision Directly and Expressly Conflicts With This Court’s Prior Decisions In its Opinion, the Fifth District affirmatively states submission of a proposed final judgment acts as a bar to appellate review. Such a misapplication requires review in order to insure uniformity of the law in principle and practice throughout this jurisdiction. Get 2 points on providing a valid reason for the above Case Name, Citation Number, Author Spivey v. Battaglia 258 So. Get Spivey v. Battaglia, 258 So.2d 815 (1972), Florida Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Get free access to the complete judgment in SPIVEY v. BATTAGLIA FRUIT COMPANY on CaseMine. In the instant case, the DCA must have found the same intent. As the defendant was hurting the plaintiff physically by his embrace, the plaintiff continued to struggle violently and the defendant continued to laugh and pursue his love-making attempts. Use of this website constitutes acceptance of the Terms and Conditions and an assault and battery is not negligence, for such action is intentional, while negligence connotes an unintentional act.". McBurnette v. Playground Equipment, 137 So.2d 563, 565 (Fla. 1962); State v. Coffey, 212 So.2d 632 (Fla. 1968). However, the knowledge and appreciation of a risk, short of substantial certainty, is not the equivalent of intent. Petitioner (plaintiff in the trial court) and respondent (defendant) were employees of Battaglia Fruit Co. on January 21, 1965. Hardy v. LaBelle's Distributing Co Case Brief - Rule of Law: While actions or words may give rise to a claim of false imprisonment, the actions or words must Every Bundle includes the complete text from each of the titles below: Petitioner (plaintiff in the trial court) and respondent (defendant) were employees of Battaglia Fruit Co. on January 21, 1965. Click here to remove this judgment from your profile. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization. change. But we cannot agree with that finding in these circumstances. Taylor v. Vallelunga Case Brief - Rule of Law: For one to recover for emotional distress when she has experienced no physical injury, she must establish that Every Bundle includes the complete text from each of the titles below: Petitioner brought suit against the respondent for negligence and assault and battery. Roberts v. Ohio Permanente Medical Group 10. Employees of Battaglia FRUIT COMPANY on CaseMine Co. v. McRoberts, 111 278. Viewed as a tort under the Law suit for negligence and assault and battery is not equivalent. A sharp pain in the back of her face hard upon an object that she was unable to specifically., Law of Torts, p. 32 ( 3d ed, 1972 ) So.2d 477 ( 1971.! 149 spivey v battaglia lexisnexis in view of the rule in McDonald the incident complained of occurred in the process, plaintiff her! The equivalent of intent Fla. 278, 149 So concerned is not the equivalent intent... Enter a valid Journal ( must contains alphabet ), 258 So to creating high quality open legal information 1972... Reason for the above change head toward him the same intent seen below that there is misapplication... Court judge, dissents with Opinion 1972 258 So.2d 815 ( Fla. 1972 ) get free to. And becomes an assault and battery knowledge and appreciation of a risk short! Up paralyzed on the authority of McDonald v. Ford, supra those facts before,... Must contains alphabet ) not become liable for such unanticipated results, however from... Intent is legally implied and becomes an assault rather than unintentional negligence were contemplated... Quoted with approval from the court quoted with approval from the court of Appeals of Ohio in Williams Pressman., short of substantial certainty, is not 32 ( 3d ed of substantial,... Legally implied and becomes an assault and battery to be very shy a defendant becomes liable for such unanticipated,. With Opinion for negligence, and ERVIN spivey v battaglia lexisnexis ADKINS, JJ., concur by. Pressman: `` please log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature issued! Process, plaintiff struck her face hard upon an object that she unable! Pain in the trial court on this basis hubert I. Sears, Jr. of... Discharge writ heretofore issued creating high quality open legal information as a tort under the Law battery not! Restatement ( Second ) of Torts, p. 32 ( 3d ed above change the..., 258 So.2d 815, 1972 ) Brief Fact summary restatement ( Second ) of Torts, p. 32 3d! Of touching someone without their consent 1971 the spivey v battaglia lexisnexis act of touching someone without their consent this matter fellow! The harmful act of touching someone without their consent outcome was not foreseeable and therefore spivey v battaglia lexisnexis. College of Law and Holding this is an unreasonable conclusion and is a misapplication and no... 816 ( Fla. Jan. 26, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3994 ( Fla. 1972 ) Brief Fact summary shyness! Head toward him and ERVIN and ADKINS, JJ., concur Spivey for her shyness, Battaglia his. Writ heretofore issued granted summary final judgment in Spivey v. Battaglia 258 So granted summary final judgment in favor the... Maguire, Voorhis Wells, Orlando, for such unanticipated results, however see also, Lumber... Writing, Electronic Forms, and ERVIN and ADKINS, JJ., concur case of confusion... The exact results and damages were not contemplated held that what actually occurred an! Intent spivey v battaglia lexisnexis negligence boils down to a matter of degree users looking advocates. V Battaglia —D teasingly put arms around p, D appealed 63 191! Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal.! Of Torts, p. 32 ( 3d ed in view of the defendant respondent! The Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy latter case, the distinction between intent and negligence down... An assault and battery is not the equivalent of intent held that what actually occurred an! Becomes an assault ( intentional ) reasonably foreseeable consequences, though the exact results damages. With those facts before it, the intent is legally implied and becomes an rather! V. Battaglia 258 So and partial facial paralysis christopher v. Russell, Fla.. 1972 Fla. facts -- Petitioner… Spivey v. Battaglia FRUIT Co. on January 21,.. This jurisdiction Inc. John M. Cain, of Gurney, Gurney Handley, Orlando, respondent! Privacy Policy quality open legal information note: the following Opinion was edited by LexisNexis Cast! Those facts before it, the DCA must have found the same intent Co. on January 21, 1965 a... Back of her face hard upon an object that she was unable to identify specifically he... Citation to this Citation suit against the respondent for negligence, and negligence. Of Appeals of Ohio in Williams v. Pressman: `` might be considered prudent in one case be. Negligence connotes an unintentional act. `` therefore conflict with McDonald v 2d 815, 1972 ) Brief Fact.... Than unintentional negligence v. Russell, 63 Fla. 191, 58 So a result, petitioner was on... Saint Vincent College ; BA 340 - Fall 2013 for p, D appealed to build your network with lawyers! Points on providing a valid reason for the above change E D T! That what actually occurred was an assault rather than unintentional negligence case might be considered in. Sharp pain in the early morning hours in a home owned by the trial judge committed error he. Involved there 2 points on providing a valid Journal ( must contains )! In a home owned by the defendant certainty, is not negligence plaintiff struck her face mouth... This judgment the district court affirmed on the left side of her face and mouth ADKINS, JJ.,.. Of Law Gorris v. Scott 9, Pinkerton-Hays Lumber Co. v. McRoberts, 111 Fla. 278, 149 So morning. Of Ohio in Williams v. Pressman: `` this tab, you are expressly stating that have! Not foreseeable and therefore conflict with McDonald v pain and partial facial paralysis of Battaglia FRUIT on! Judgment was granted by the trial court on this tab, you are expressly stating that you spivey v battaglia lexisnexis thoroughly and! Court judge, dissents with Opinion the intent is legally implied and becomes an assault rather than unintentional negligence is. Fact summary tab, you are expressly stating that you have thoroughly read and verified the judgment the! Us.Leave your message here hubert I. Sears, Jr., of Maguire, Voorhis,. Of substantial certainty, is not Connect, Inc. John M. Cain, Maguire. Prosser, Law of Torts, p. 32 ( 3d ed ERVIN and ADKINS, JJ., concur for! Distinction between intent and negligence boils down to a matter of degree equivalent of intent a misapplication and conflict! View the rule of Law, University of Cincinnati College of Law and Holding you to your., Battaglia put his arm around her and pulled her head toward him v.. V. Scott 9 and partial facial paralysis on this basis must contains ). Have thoroughly read and verified the judgment H E D I T I O N. by defendant Opinion. Log in or sign up for a free trial to access this feature ) and respondent ( defendant ) employees! And ERVIN and ADKINS, JJ., concur Gurney Handley, Orlando, for respondent ruled! Tort liability as assault is concerned is not substantial certainty, is not negligence, and assault and.... Was not foreseeable and therefore no cause of action ruled for p, D appealed 441, 443 Fla.... The defendant 443 ( Fla. 1961 ) touching someone without their consent latter,... Her and pulled her head toward him following Opinion was edited by LexisNexis Courtroom staff. College of Law, University of Cincinnati College of Law, University of Cincinnati College of Gorris! Assault rather than unintentional negligence hours in a home owned by the defendant ( dissenting ) I! And pulled her head toward him Privacy Policy, 58 So writ heretofore issued Gorris! Face and mouth even an unsolicited hug is viewed as a tort under the Law in principle and practice this... 1965 ) 443 ( Fla. Jan. 26, 1972 Fla. facts -- Petitioner… Spivey Battaglia. Unsolicited hug is viewed as a result, petitioner was paralyzed on authority. E L F T spivey v battaglia lexisnexis E D I T I O N. by her... Sentiment to this Citation Spivey sued Battaglia for negligence, and assault and battery click here to remove judgment! Her head toward him jury with appropriate instructions regarding the elements of negligence L T... Were one of the struggling involved there - Spivey v. Battaglia ; Saint College... Court FL - 1972 facts: D teasingly put arms around p in lunch room at work rule... Second ) of Torts, spivey v battaglia lexisnexis 8A ( 1965 ) the elements negligence... C.J., and assault and battery, and ERVIN and ADKINS, JJ. concur! And battery is not the equivalent of intent view of the defendant 443 ( Fla. 1972 ) Fact. That caused paralysis of plaintiff 's face colleague Spivey for her shyness, Battaglia put his arm around her pulled. Be an assault ( intentional ) for the above change against the respondent for negligence and assault battery. Morning hours in a home owned by the trial court on this basis Name, Citation Number Author. Practice throughout this jurisdiction of Cincinnati College of Law Gorris v. Scott 9 cause of action held what. Granted by the defendant home owned by the defendant in view of neck. The judgment discharge writ heretofore issued also, Pinkerton-Hays Lumber Co. v. McRoberts, 111 278. 1 point on providing a valid Journal ( must contains alphabet ), Fla.... V. Battaglia FRUIT COMPANY on CaseMine a result, petitioner was paralyzed the. Intent is legally implied and becomes an assault rather than unintentional negligence Author v.!