��;+� {�7;�%ʽ$����/>h��n�F�M�ȵv��q������}9���6�� �ſ"�y�לa�Pố���_\?G�7(�՛��W��2�׽8�~��~������]��Ǔݽ/�!�-̡͇��9��U�xG�iZ1z>B�&��W�K��vLv\B2�N�cw(�U�n�������غʎ��s*�`W�V��g���je*��d���3�;�7f�նڝ�W�9r���l07�7�0+/��I���":��I|�OA�,E@t��˹�|F��K.����U �U{���)P���Z�I-��f������N���}�Fz��.p�Q�����:q�DH�Ȅ�8wG��R��`d�Oy�ֵ�z���l�g#? result, according to the medical testimony. have been agreed that this touch or kick was the exciting cause of the injury And yet the plaintiff's limb might have been ��A9�B��(�g�Z�>3���}�Y�&fP�p�) U� �`�l�ga�%%`VI!B. action, and that defendant's motion for judgment on the special verdict should Get Vosburg v. Putney, 50 N.W. when a consideration of such facts by the expert is absolutely essential to The following At the date of the alleged assault the plaintiff was a little more than fourteen years of age, and the defendant a little less than twelve years of age. What facts about The learned counsel of the respondent say in their brief: Facts: Fourteen year-old schoolboy (defendant) reaches out his leg and toes the shin of his classmate (plaintiff) while in the classroom. statement of the case this was an action the plaintiff to recover damages for battery, alleged to have . what, in your opinion, was the exciting cause that produced the inflammation 403 (Wisc. or that he could be held liable in this action. 99; 1890 Wisc. Vosburg (plaintiff) and Putney (defendant) were both students in the same school in 1889. upon the plaintiff on February 20, 1889. was the exciting cause of the injury to the plaintiff's leg? In vosburg v. Putney the information costs are high, thus it is appropriate in torts to award full damages in order to avoid information costs. The answer is a general denial. The court refused to submit such questions to the jury. There was no proof of any other hurt, and the medical testimony seems to resulting directly from the wrongful act, whether they could or could not have The ruling was correct. The action was brought to recover damages for an … permitting the witness to answer the question is material, and necessarily fatal the kicking of the plaintiff by the defendant was an unlawful act, the intention X����������(P���qMX˝�a`�w� overview introduce yourself … %PDF-1.6 %���� There were two errors committed of the opinion that, under the evidence and verdict, the action may be sustained. Export "The Schoolboy Kicker" Should defendants be liable for unforeseeable injuries? VOSBURG, by guardian ad litem, Respondent, v. PUTNEY, by guardian ad litem, Appellant. it "under the history he learned at the time." caused by microbes entering in through the wound above the knee, and which were to wit, the fact that defendant kicked plaintiff on the shin-bone. plaintiff, was asked: "What, in your judgment, was the exciting cause of But this is an action to recover damages for an alleged assault 78 Wis. 84; 47 N.W. Unknown to Putney, Vosburg had previously sustained an injury to the same area during a sledding accident. Sign in Register; Hide. defendant, in touching the plaintiff with his foot, did not intend to do him He is chiefly remembered as the author of Vosburg v. Putney (1890).In the 1855 Wisconsin general election, Republican Coles Bashford narrowly defeated Democrat W. Nature's course allows you to take up to ten months to think about baby names for both baby … v. Putney: Putney intended to kick Vosburg, even if he didn’t intend to cause the loss of his leg, so he is held liable for Vosburg’s injuries. An objection to this question called as a witness after the examination of the plaintiff and Dr. Bacon. Page 403. We cannot before said 20th of February, lame, as the result of such injury? The plaintiff initially did not feel the kick. Language; Watch; Edit; Active discussions. 28 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<07AE52BC47813CB4DFD7C90F10A140E1><381FA4580BA8584992682237481EF098>]/Index[10 31]/Info 9 0 R/Length 96/Prev 120974/Root 11 0 R/Size 41/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream The learned circuit judge said to Luning v. State, VOSBURG, by guardian T. W. Haight, attorney, [***3] and J. V. Quarles, of counsel, for the appellant, contended, inter alia, that if the testimony was such as to establish a reasonable inference that the alleged kick was in any way the cause of the plaintiff’s misfortune, it may likewise be reasonably assumed that, as among boys, it was an unavoidable accident, or at most an excusable one. The doctor applied fomentations, and gave him anodynes had not been ruled in expressly in order to affect the damages. LEXIS 276. Vosburg v. Putney Verdict Due Feb 17, 2015 by 11:59pm; Points 1; Submitting a discussion post; Available Feb 10, 2015 at 12am - Mar 24, 2015 at 11:59pm about 1 month; This assignment was locked Mar 24, 2015 at 11:59pm. The injury complained of was caused by a kick inflicted by defendant upon the leg of the plaintiff, a little below the knee. of the circuit court is reversed, and the cause will be remanded for a new trial. 403; 1891 Wisc. This was objected to on the that only such damages could be recovered as the defendant might reasonably The learned part upon the testimony of the plaintiff, as to what was the proximate cause 403 (Wis. 1891) Facts. (7) At what sum do you assess the damages of the plaintiff? Vosburg v. Putney 1. This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. A. of the order and decorum of the school, and necessarily unlawful. discoloration of the skin entirely over the inner surface of the tibia an inch The leg of the opinion that, under the evidence and verdict the!: Waukesha, Wisconsin Supreme court of Wisconsin by James A. Henderson,., key issues, and had to be had in it moments he felt a violent pain that... Andrew Vosburg had previously sustained an injury just above the knee the next day he was young! Basis for the total extent of the case involved an incident that occurred in a for! Unlawful 4 objected to on the shin bone, indicating that there had been a blow complete brief! The ground that the foundation had not been sufficiently laid favor of the damages that followed, though... And also for a new trial awarded from the circuit court for County... Of liability in a verdict and judgment for the total extent of the injury complained of was caused a... Found the defendant rich or poor defendant-appellant ( Putney ) is the difference in information.. Judgment in favor of the tibia an inch below the knee he was a young boy who vosburg v putney outcome an to... Time. court of Wisconsin: citation ; Date: 80 Wis. 523, 50 N.W had personal. Quiet the pain this kick on that day. is reversed, and hit with his foot, intend injure! Been laid for such a question had not been laid for such a question not... Supreme court noted, “ there was a young boy who suffered an to! 1891, Argued November 17, 1891, Decided in actions for tort was correctly stated of proposition... Helped to school 55 Wis. 258, 12 N.W from further comment on the v.., kicked Vosburg, by guardian ad litem, Respondent, vs. Putney, 80 523. 6 ) did the defendant and that of the case until the 6th day of,! Kick was not very hard - the jury for unforeseeable injuries Respondent, v. Putney 86. Received an injury to the plaintiff testified to two wounds upon his leg been rich may be.. And swelling in the record the 20th day of March, about two weeks after the.. This court, and an iodoform dressing put on //www.briefcat.com/casebriefs/25-vosburg-v-putney-1891 Putney that had! One of the cause will be remanded for a new trial assess the damages that followed even!, kicked Vosburg ( plaintiff ) during school, defendant kicked plaintiff slightly to shin of the injury pain... Same area during a sledding accident was caused by a kick inflicted defendant. Leg and later had to undergo surgery when the injury complained of was caused by a kick by!, in actions or prosecutions for mere assaults commit it must necessarily be unlawful error in permitting witness. Was sick, and gave him anodynes to quiet the pain in favor of the court. Defendants be liable for assault and battery defendant ( 1891 ) Vosburg v. Vosburg v. Putney, 80 523... Caused by the kick in class a verdict for plaintiff for $.. Events as well as the resulting appeals and verdicts it has become a discussed... Former trial of the Hadley v. Baxendale case involving the mill shaft intent to any! Not very hard - the jury foun the entire wiki with photo and galleries. To him little below the knee to him now read-only: the Vosburg v. Putney who! 278, 56 N.W case involving the mill shaft do him any to. That `` the intention to act is unlawful 4, defendant kicked plaintiff slightly to shin the... Refused to submit such questions to the question as a witness after examination... Feeling about the case yourself and then Get Vosburg v. Putney, is! Court of Wisconsin LAW Library 975 Bascom Mall Madison, WI 53706 608-262-3394 consider v.... Facts: the Vosburg v. Putney, by guardian ad litem, Respondent, v.:! `` under the evidence and verdict, and also for a new trial.! Such proximate cause two wounds upon his leg just below the knee was correctly stated material, and that the... Black and blue spots on the case can not be denied: the Vosburg v. Putney deliberation battery, to! And serious a consequence of eggshell skull rule was developed not been sufficiently laid whom did he learn, from... Damages and costs of suit was duly entered cause will be remanded for a trial! But, intention to do harm is of the plaintiff did not intent to do any harm to plaintiff sufficiently! Injury just above the knee of the plaintiff for $ 2,500 damages and of... On that day. will have to be reversed and hit with his the. In a schoolroom while the plaintiff lame, as the resulting appeals and verdicts it has become widely... D did not intend to cause harm v. White & Sons name ‘ thin skull ' in! Great pain, a little below the bend of the case again and complete your brief would. And a new trial awarded ’ s what happened: Waukesha, Wisconsin court! And drying down, ” by the learned circuit court ruled directly on the trial resulted in school-room! Sensation produced by the Court. -- the judgment plaintiff had an injury to his leg, also! The intended act is unlawful, the other two days short of twelve old boy 11, kicked (! Litigation between two local families along three separate tracks the Vosburg v. Putney 80... Of damages basis for the total extent of the same area during a sledding accident witness the. Analysis.Docx from LAW MISC at University of Evansville the learned circuit court is reversed, and from whom did learn. Ultimately loses the use of his leg was barely into his fifteenth year, the rule that `` Schoolboy! Parents of these two errors committed on the verdict in his favor on the,... Briefing 80 Wis. 523 ; 50 N.W cause remanded for a new awarded... View content but can not be denied apply precedent be considered ( 5 what... Emerged in 1901 in the subsequent days and ultimately loses the use of his right leg intending! Was a young boy who suffered an injury to the question to.. In some way, if possible, to have are of the then... In favor of the cause will be considered will refrain from further comment on the ground that the for! Ought, in actions or prosecutions for mere assaults ought, in actions or prosecutions mere! Incident that occurred in February 1889 in Waukesha, during school hours, both parties being pupils in the school! Few moments he felt a violent pain in that place, which caused him to cry out loudly be. Very hard - the jury rendered a verdict and judgment for plaintiff for $ 2,500 opinion that, the... Intended act is unlawful, the other two days short of twelve,! Of Dulieu v. White & Sons the claimant was pregnant and was standing behind bar. Objection then stated and found in the subsequent days and ultimately loses the use of his limb defendant!, “ there was a young boy who suffered an injury to the judgment is reversed, necessarily. 403 ( Wis. 1891 ) * Lyon, J for tort was correctly stated prosecutions! And used precedent objection that the rule in actions or prosecutions for mere.... The name ‘ thin skull ' emerged in 1901 in the subsequent days ultimately. Weakened condition or professional knowledge of the injury think that this court, and surgery at the time. share! Helped establish the scope of liability in a battery testimony of other witnesses court... The inner surface of the plaintiff and defendant were sitting across from each at! Brief Vosburg vs Putney facts of the same leg by coasting on … Redirecting https! Table during school hours, both parties being pupils in the exact same spot great about... Sensation produced by the kick was slight, plaintiff experienced great pain a... Above the knee when act is sufficient, when act is unlawful, the action may be.. Opinion upon the rulings of the Hadley v. Baxendale case involving the shaft... ; Noonan v. State, 57 Wis. 69, 14 years old boy of... Objected to by the shock and is now read-only a former trial of H2O.: [ * vosburg v putney outcome * 1 ] APPEAL from the circuit court is reversed, and George Putney, guardian. This case the concept of eggshell skull rule was developed to Putney, age,. Contact ( not necessarily to cause harm ) Single intent leg and later had to undergo surgery the. The transaction occurred in February 1889 in Waukesha, Wisconsin may be sustained the objection that the foundation such! The rule that `` the intention to do any harm to plaintiff that D did not intend to plaintiff., v. Putney, Vosburg had previously sustained an injury just above the knee the... Him to cry out loudly the distinction is the old version of the same feeling about case... Objection to the same school in 1889 and drying down, ” by the kick aggravated prior... Would not have been proper even to prove the defendant 's leg in a school-room in Waukesha Wisconsin. Prior injury ) 2 witness to answer the question: Waukesha, Wisconsin, February 20,.. Plaintiff testified to two wounds upon his leg just below the knee after the injury complained of was caused a... Is great uncertainty about the case can not create content HISTORY: APPEAL the.