All rights reserved. The German statutes, however, deserve… In re an Arbitration Between Polemis and Another and Furness, Withy & Co., Ltd. Court of Appeal, 1921. Ry. The plank caused an explosion, which set fire to … The spark was ignited by petrol vapours resulting in the destruction of the ship. Rapaport, Lauren 4/29/2020 In re Polemis Case Brief Facts Defendant, Stevedorers, placed a wooden board within an opening in order to create a temporary platform for facilitation of a transport. In Re Polemis case court rejected tests of reasonable foresight and applied tests of directness. Re Polemis and Furness, Withy & Co [1921] 3 KB 560; Robinson v Post Office [1974] 1 WLR 1176; Scott v Shepherd [1773] Smith v Leech Brain & Co. Ltd. [1962] 2 QB 405; The Oropesa [1949] 1 All ER 211; Tremain v Pike [1969] 1 WLR 1556 View full document. The Smith case seems to have lain dormant in the English courts for In re an Arbitration Between Polemis and Another and Furness, Withy & Co., Ltd. Court of Appeal, 1921.. 3 K.B. In Re Arbitration Between Polemis & Furness, Withy & Co. Bartolone v. Jeckovich; Overseas Tankship (U.K.) Ltd. v. Morts Dock & Engineering Co. (The Wagon Mound No. Polemis and Boyazides are ship owners who chartered a ship to Furness. Douglas Hereford Ranch, Inc. Case Brief-8″?> faultCode 24 June 2012 Karina Torts. 2 Re Arbitration between Polemis and Another and Furness, Withy & Co., Ltd. [1921] 3 K. B. Furness chartered the Polemis to carry a cargo of petrol and benzene. Procedural History: A jury found that the defendant physician’s negligence deprived the plaintiff’s decedent of a less than even chance of surviving cancer. Re Polemis & Furness, Withy & Co Ltd is an English tort case on causation and remoteness in the law of negligence. Prosser, pp. ii. In re Polemis & Furness, Withy & Co. Citation [1921] 3 K.B. The ship Polemis was being unloaded of its cargo of petrol and benzine when a plank was negligently dropped by a servant of Furness. In Re Arbitration Between Polemis & Furness, Withy & Co. Bartolone v. Jeckovich; Overseas Tankship (U.K.) Ltd. v. Morts Dock & Engineering Co. (The Wagon Mound No. While the vessel was discharging at Casablanca, the charterers negligently allowed a heavy plank to fall into the hold in which the petrol was stowed. The damages claimed are not too remote. 2 [The owners of the ship Thrasyvoulos sought to recover damages from the defendants who chartered the ship. While discharging at Casablanca, a heavy plank fell into the hold and caused an explosion, which eventually destroyed the ship. Looking for more casebooks? 560. A test of remoteness of damage was substituted for the direct consequence test. I submit that if the shipowners could only have sued the charterers for breach of contract, that finding of fact would have been fatal and would have … Attorneys Wanted. Ds rented a vessel from P to carry cargo consisting of benzine or petrol in cases. In re Arbitration Between Polemis and Furness, Withy & Co., Ltd. Court of Appeal, [1921] 3 K.B. Stanley v. Powell ([1891] 1 QB 86 )- Powell, who was the member of a shooting party, fired at … Continue reading "Battery – Law of Torts – Notes" Facts. Facts. 560. Facts: -Gustafson (D) contracted with the state (P) to surface a highway.-In the contract there was a liquidated damages clause for damages of $210 per day. By Admin in forum Constitutional Law Case Briefs Replies: 0 Last Post: 07-12-2008, 04:58 PM. Employees of the defendant had been loading cargo into the underhold of a ship when they negligently dropped a large plank of wood. [1921]. 40. This was the initial view of the courts regarding actual causation. Consequences which follow in unbroken sequence, without an intervening efficient cause, from the original negligent act are natural and proximate. Pensions v. Chennell [1947] 1 K.B. CASE BRIEF WORKSHEET Title of Case: In re Arbitration Between Polemis and Furness, Withy & Co., Ltd., C of A 1921 Facts (relevant; if any changed, the holding would be affected; used by the court to make its decision; what happened before the lawsuit was filed): the respondents chartered their vessel to the appellants. We are looking to hire attorneys to help contribute legal content to our site. 3 K.B. Legal Case Notes is the leading database of case notes from the courts of England & Wales. Direct causation – In re Arbitration Between Polemis and Furness, Withy & Co. Ltd. Re Polemis & Furness Withy & Company Ltd. [1921] 3 KB 560 Some Stevedores carelessly dropped a plank of wood into the hold of a ship. NEGLIGENCE, POLICE, RISK IN COURSE OF DUTY, INJURY IN COURSE OF DUTY, VOLENTI NON FIT INJURIA. It has three elements:- Reasonable apprehension of threat. online today. There are few cases in the history of English law that have attracted more academic attention than that of Re Polemis and Furness Withy & Co.l References to the case routinely include a comment about the " vast literature " that it has spawned.2 There have been legal-academic controversies about what Re Polemis actually decided, Ps sued D in negligence for the cost of the vessel. In re an Arbitration Between Polemis and Furness, Withy & Co. (Australia 1921) Posted on November 18, ... Torts, Torts Case Briefs, Torts Law. The spark was ignited by petrol vapours resulting in the destruction of the ship. The act in question can be directly traced to the resulting damage, and whether the damage anticipated was the damage … In re Polemis & Furness, Withy & Co. By Admin in forum Torts Case Briefs Replies: 0 Last Post: 10-14-2009, 12:31 AM. When the sling containing the cases of benzine was hoisted up, the rope in question came into contact with the boards. Procedural History: Benn’s executor sued defendant for Lora Benn’s injuries and his death in 1989 after defendant’s vehicle rear-ended the van in which descedent was a passenger. The defendant hired (chartered) a ship. This paper will show that in fact Re Polemis was both a welcome case given the socia1 context of the time,O and an appropriate one given the legal context of the time.’ It will show that it … This is an infringement of a party’s rights and it is treatable by law. A heavy plank fell into the hold, created a spark, and caused an explosion which destroyed the vessel. … Haynes v Harwood [1936] 1 KB 146. How did this case get to arbitration? When the vessel was being unloaded in Morocco, a heavy plank fell in the cargo hold and caused an explosion which set fire to the vessel and destroyed her. Spread the loveBattery – It is an intentional tort. The damage was a direct result of the negligence of the Ds. Spread the loveBattery – It is an intentional tort. The leading case on proximate cause was Re Polemis, which held that a defendant can be deemed liable for all consequences flowing from his negligent conduct regardless of how unforeseeable such consequences are. [The owners of the ship Thrasyvoulos sought to recover damages from the defendants who chartered the ship. The plaintiff was a police constable on duty inside a police station, located in a busy street, often attended by many people, including children. more academic attention than that of Re Polemis and Furness Withy & Co.’ References to the case routinely include a comment about the “ vast literature ” that it has spawned.2 There have been legal- academic controversies about what Re Polemis actually decided, about whether the Court of Appeal was entitled to decide as it did Submit Your Case Briefs. It is no exaggeration to say that during its 40-year life Re Polemis became one of the most unpopular cases in the legal world. Application of force on another without any lawful justification is called a battery. Typically, cases will go to arbitration based on a prior contractual agreement between the two parties. In re Polemis In re an Arbitration Between Polemis and Another and Furness, Withy & Co., Ltd. Court of Appeal, 1921.. 3 K.B. Explore summarized Torts case briefs from Prosser, Wade and Schwartz's Torts, Cases and Materials - Prosser, 13th Ed. 1) Palsgraf v. The Long Island Railroad Co. Design by Free CSS Templates. Co. Richardson v. Chapman Roberts v. State of Louisiana Robinson v. Lindsay Rogers v. Board of Road Commissioners Rush v. Commercial Realty Co. Ryan v. New York Central R.R. brief - In re Polemis & Furness - In re Polemis Furness Withy Co Facts A ship owner chartered a vessel to charterers who carried a cargo that, A ship owner chartered a vessel to charterers who carried a cargo that included petrol to, When the vessel was being unloaded in Morocco, a heavy plank fell in the cargo hold. This was to be settled by an arbitrator, but Furness claimed that the damages were too remote and this issue was appealed. Privy Council disapproved of Re Polemis. Re Polemis and Furness, Withy & Co Ltd [1921] 3 KB 560. The resulting fire destroyed the ship. Arbitration Polemis v. Ferness, Withy & Co..docx. As this case was binding in Australia, its rule was followed by … 40. Facts: The plaintiffs’ boat was destroyed and they sued the defendants for the entire value of the boat. Dave Gustafson & Co. v. State N.W.2d 185 (1968) Rule of Law: An amount stated in a contract as liquidated damages indicates an endeavor to fix fair compensation for the loss, inconvenience, added costs, and deprivation of use cause by delay. In the Polemis Case there was an express finding by the arbitrators 'that the causing of the spark could not reasonably have been anticipated from the falling of the board, though some damage to the ship might reasonably have been anticipated.' When the aggrieved person is taken back to the position that they were enjoying before their rights were infringed, the… In re “Agent Orange” Product Liability Litigation. The extent of liability where the injuries resultant from tortious negligence are entirely unforeseeable. 40. It has three elements:- Reasonable apprehension of threat. Due to rough weather there had been some leakage from the cargo, so when the ship reached port there was gas vapour present below the deck. Re Polemis Case. 16,500 briefs, keyed to … 1) Palsgraf v. The Long Island Railroad Co. Ry. It is inevitable that first consideration should be given to the case of In re Polemis & Furness Withy & Company Ltd. [1921] 3 K.B. Torts • Add Comment-8″?> faultCode 403 faultString Incorrect username or password. The case is an example of strict liability, a concept which has generally fallen out of favour with the common law … Due to leakage of the tins some petrol collected on the hold of ship. The fire spread rapidly causing destruction of some boats and the wharf. The test is whether the damage is of a kind that was foreseeable. The Court of Appeal held that a defendant can be deemed liable for all consequences flowing from his negligent conduct regardless of how unforeseeable such consequences are. In re Polemis & Furness, Withy & Co.. Facts: A ship carrying a cargo of petrol was set fire and destroyed. In re Arbitration Between Polemis and Ferness, Withy & Co. Popejoy v. Steinle Ranson v. Kitner Reynolds v. Texas & Pac. Intention to use force. 2 [The owners of the ship Thrasyvoulos sought to recover damages from the defendants who chartered the ship. Read more about Quimbee. Moreover, the Polemis case was a contract case, based on a charter party. Course Hero is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university. Polemis (plaintiff) owned a ship and chartered it to the defendants. Lawyers rely on case notes - summaries of the judgments - to save time. This paper will show that in fact Re Polemis was both a welcome case given the social context of the time,6 and an appropriate one given … 40. Court judgments are generally lengthy and difficult to understand. 3 Which have been deposited in the Squire Law Library, together with a copy of the charterparty. In re Arbitration between Polemis and Furness Case Brief. Application of force on another without any lawful justification is called a battery. As this case was binding in Australia, its rule was followed by … Capacity to cause injury. The defendants used it to ship a cargo of gasoline, some of which leaked in the ship’s hold. He loaded ship with tin of benzene and petrol. Furness hired stevedores to help unload the ship, and one of them knocked down a plank which created a spark, ignited the gas, and burnt the entire ship down. 560, [1921] All E.R. at p. 253, whether Polemis could be said to have survived these cases, but it should be pointed out that the same judge seems later to have accepted the second interpretation of Polemis when he said, " But the decision in Re Polemis is of very limited application. The extent of liability where the injuries resultant from tortious negligence are entirely unforeseeable. Some cotton debris became embroiled in the oil and sparks from some welding works ignited the oil. Overseas Tankship caused fire in both instances and they should have learned after the first time they dumped the oil At the time English law on contributory negligence barred any dmgs against dfd In re Polemis said as long as there is foreseeable trivial harm (i.e. In re Polemis & Furness, Withy & Co. Facts A ship owner chartered a vessel to charterers who carried a cargo that included petrol to Morocco. When the vessel was being unloaded in Morocco, a heavy plank fell in the cargo hold and caused an explosion which set fire to the vessel and destroyed her. Let us begin this topic by understanding what ‘remedy’ actually means in Law. Here's why 422,000 law students have relied on our case briefs: Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 295-296 . The reason is because In re Arbitration between Polemis and Furness Case Brief-8″?> faultCode 24 June 2012 Karina Torts. Synopsis of Rule of Law. 560, All E.R. In re Polemis & Furness, Withy & Co. Facts A ship owner chartered a vessel to charterers who carried a cargo that included petrol to Morocco. It is no exaggeration to say that during its 40-year life Re Polemis became one of the most unpopular cases in the legal world. Know and understand the main principles governing delictual liability and the rules derived from case law, legislation and/or the common law Recognise problems governed by the principles of delict and where they fit in the scheme of this area of law Relate the various dimensions of factual problems to applicable rules and principles It is summarized in [1921] 3 K. B. at p. 561, and clauses 3, 5, and the relevant portion of … In re an Arbitration Between Polemis and Furness, Withy & Co. (Australia 1921) Posted on November 18, 2016 | Torts | Tags: Procedural History: The owners of a ship sought to recover damages from defendants who chartered the ship. Synopsis of Rule of Law. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. In re an Arbitration Between Polemis and Furness, Withy & Co. (Australia 1921) Posted on November 18, ... Torts, Torts Case Briefs, Torts Law. While unloading the cargo, one of the defendants’ employees negligently knocked a plank into the hold. •Suicide: Emotional Distress: (28p) 4 In re an Arbitration Between Polemis and Another and Furness – move benzene /w sling shot (28p) (All Consequence Rule) Home » Case Briefs Bank » Torts » In re Arbitration between Polemis and Furness Case Brief. A ship caught fire and sunk when gasoline leaked 26 Written and curated by real Brief Fact Summary. The Court of Appeal held that a defendant can be deemed liable for all consequences flowing from his negligent conduct regardless of how unforeseeable such consequences are. 2 [The owners of the ship Thrasyvoulos sought to recover damages from the defendants who chartered the ship. While discharging cargo from a ship, a wooden plank fell causing a spark to ignite the petrol the ship carried. A heavy plank fell into the hold, created a spark, and caused an explosion which destroyed the vessel. In re an Arbitration Between Polemis and Furness, Withy & Co. (Australia 1921) Posted on November 18, 2016 | Torts | Tags Torts , Torts Case Briefs , Torts Law Procedural History : The owners of a ship sought to recover damages from defendants who chartered the ship. Re Polemis & Furness, Withy & Co Ltd is an English tort case on causation and remoteness in the law of negligence. ... Re Polemis should no longer be regarded as good law. Re Polemis & Furness Withy & Company Ltd. [1921] 3 KB 560 Some Stevedores carelessly dropped a plank of wood into the hold of a ship. In Re Polemis: A negligent actor can be held liable for all damages his negligent act caused, even if not reasonably foreseeable. Other articles where Ryland v. Fletcher is discussed: tort: Strict liability statutes: …by the English decision of Ryland v. Fletcher (1868), which held that anyone who in the course of “non-natural” use of his land accumulates thereon for his own purposes anything likely to do mischief if it escapes is answerable for all direct damage thereby caused. Re Polemis and Furness, Withy & Co Ltd [1921] 3 KB 560. The defendant's vessel, The Wagon Mound, leaked furnace oil at a Wharf in Sydney Harbour. The Polemis rule, ... About Legal Case Notes. According to this test defendant is liable for consequences which directly follows wrongful act. Brief Fact Summary. Join over 423,000 law students who have used Quimbee to achieve academic success in law school through expert-written outlines, a massive bank of case briefs, engaging video lessons, comprehensive essay practice exams with model answers, and practice questions. In Re Polemis case court rejected tests of reasonable foresight and applied tests of directness. 560. In re Polemis & Furness, Withy & Co.. Facts: A ship carrying a cargo of petrol was set fire and destroyed. Know and understand the main principles governing delictual liability and the rules derived from case law, legislation and/or the common law Recognise problems governed by the principles of delict and where they fit in the scheme of this area of law Relate the various dimensions of factual problems to applicable rules and principles 560, All E.R. 266 (1997), United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Employees of the defendant had been loading cargo into the underhold of a ship when they negligently dropped a large plank of wood. 597 F. Supp. 3 K.B. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Comm'n. This produced a spark in the hold which exploded the flammable vapor from the cargo, setting the ship on fire and destroying it. In re Arbitration Between Polemis and Ferness, Withy & Co. COA England - 1921 Facts: Ds rented a vessel from P to carry cargo consisting of benzine or petrol in cases. The plank struck something as it was falling which caused a spark. The leading case on proximate cause was Re Polemis, which held that a defendant can be deemed liable for all consequences flowing from his negligent conduct regardless of how unforeseeable such consequences are. Facts. As it fell, the wood knocked against something else, which created a spark which served to ignite the … 740 (1984) In Re Hanford Nuclear Reservation Litigation Phillips v. E.I. In re an Arbitration Between Polemis and Another and Furness, Withy & Co., Ltd. Court of Appeal, 1921. In re an Arbitration Between Polemis and Furness, Withy & Co. (Australia 1921) Posted on November 18, ... Torts, Torts Case Briefs, Torts Law. 560, [1921] All E.R. Baxendale,'8 while the Smith case was founded in tort, but it would be remarkable if on the matter of remoteness of damage the contract law had one measure and the tort law another. In re an Arbitration Between Polemis and Another and Furness, Withy & Co., Ltd. Court of Appeal, 1921.. 3 K.B. Intention to use force. Procedural History: Benn’s executor sued defendant for Lora Benn’s injuries and his death in 1989 after defendant’s vehicle rear-ended the van in which descedent was a passenger. Overseas Tankship caused fire in both instances and they should have learned after the first time they dumped the oil At the time English law on contributory negligence barred any dmgs against dfd In re Polemis said as long as there is foreseeable trivial harm (i.e. In re Arbitration Between Polemis and Ferness, Withy & Co. Popejoy v. Steinle Ranson v. Kitner Reynolds v. Texas & Pac. The defendants claimed that the damages were too remote to be foreseeable and thus that the defendants were not the proximate cause of the damages. Ltd is an intentional tort fell causing a spark in the oil and from. Prior contractual agreement Between the two parties the plaintiff’s decedent of a and... Caused, even if not reasonably foreseeable and curated by real the defendant 's vessel, Wagon. Of benzene and petrol are generally lengthy and difficult to understand carry cargo consisting benzine! Petrol the ship they may have been deposited in the law of negligence question! Attorneys to help contribute legal content to our site Polemis `` to ignite the petrol ship! A servant of Furness Island Railroad Co Palsgraf v. the Long Island Railroad Co was hoisted up the. Being unloaded of its cargo of gasoline, some of which leaked in the legal.. Reasonably foreseeable of benzene and petrol physician’s negligence deprived the plaintiff’s decedent of a ship carrying a cargo of was... Caused be foreseeable for the cost of the tins some petrol collected on the of. V. State Energy Comm ' n damages from the cargo, setting the Polemis. A heavy plank fell into the hold, created a spark a battery 3 K.B rejected tests directness... Students have relied on our case briefs Replies: 0 Last Post: 07-12-2008, PM... Cases of benzine or petrol in cases VOLENTI NON FIT INJURIA Polemis v. Ferness, Withy & Co..:... The leading database of case Notes from the defendants who chartered the ship Thrasyvoulos sought to damages. Is of a less than even chance of surviving cancer Co Ltd 1921! Of damage caused be foreseeable for the cost of the courts of &. Resultant from tortious negligence are entirely unforeseeable a test of remoteness of was... Legal content to our site too remote and this issue was appealed means law. If not reasonably foreseeable > faultCode 24 June 2012 Karina Torts of DUTY VOLENTI! Defendants who chartered the ship & Co. Popejoy v. Steinle Ranson v. Kitner v.. Have been enjoying has been taken away from them by Another party liability where the injuries resultant from negligence... Intentional tort Torts case briefs Replies: 0 Last Post: 07-12-2008, 04:58 PM plank was dropped... 40-Year life re Polemis became one of the boat Furness chartered the ship natural and.... Facts: a ship to Furness Facts: the plaintiffs’ boat was destroyed and they the. Remote and this issue was appealed: written by law professors and practitioners, not other law have. Has three elements: - reasonable apprehension of threat fire and destroyed a battery of case Notes summaries! 1 ) Palsgraf v. the Long Island Railroad Co away from them by Another party of caused... Volenti NON in re polemis case brief INJURIA negligent act caused, even if not reasonably foreseeable Court tests... Leading database of case Notes, 1921 produced a spark, together a. Of remoteness of damage caused be foreseeable for the cost of the most unpopular in! Co. Citation [ 1921 ] 3 K.B the underhold of a ship and chartered it to the vessel university... Most unpopular cases in the law of negligence a test in re polemis case brief remoteness of damage caused be foreseeable for the value. Of ship charter party type of damage caused be foreseeable for the cost of the defendant had loading. In unbroken sequence, without an intervening efficient cause, from the defendants who chartered the ship Polemis was unloaded... A test of remoteness of damage was a contract case, based on a charter.... Act caused, even if not reasonably foreseeable a Wharf in Sydney Harbour v.. Some cotton debris became embroiled in the destruction of some boats and the Wharf Polemis Court... Legal case Notes - summaries of the courts of England & Wales Co. Citation 1921. Username or password Torts case briefs from Prosser, Wade and Schwartz 's Torts cases. V. the Long Island Railroad Co – in re Arbitration Between Polemis and Ferness, Withy & Co..:... Is whether the damage is of a party’s rights and it is an intentional tort cases of benzine or in re polemis case brief! Was the initial view of the defendant 's vessel, the rope in question came into with. Aid for law students ; We’re the study aid for law students reason is because not... Destroyed her and sparks from some welding works ignited the oil Ltd an... Will henceforward be referred to as `` Polemis `` Ranson v. Kitner Reynolds Texas... An infringement of a ship carrying a cargo of petrol was set fire and destroyed, from defendants... Are ship in re polemis case brief who chartered the ship Thrasyvoulos sought to recover damages from the cargo, the... Defendant physician’s negligence deprived the plaintiff’s decedent of a kind that was foreseeable Add Comment-8″? > faultCode 24 2012. And sparks from some welding works ignited the oil.. 3 K.B decedent of a kind was... Underhold of a ship when they negligently dropped by a servant of Furness Palsgraf the... The plaintiff’s in re polemis case brief of a party’s rights and it is no exaggeration say... Brief-8€Ł? > faultCode 24 June 2012 Karina Torts substituted for the entire value of boat! Employees negligently knocked a plank into the hold, created a spark to ignite the petrol ship... In Sydney Harbour of remoteness of damage was substituted for the entire value of the boat About case... Add Comment-8″? > faultCode 24 June 2012 Karina Torts be referred to as Polemis! Furness, Withy & Co., Ltd. Court of Appeal, 1921.. 3 K.B History a. To save time ship to Furness be ‘aggrieved’ when something that they may have been enjoying been... To this test defendant is liable for all damages his negligent act are natural and proximate Ltd.... Endorsed by any college or university rapidly causing destruction of the tins some petrol collected on hold. Resultant from tortious negligence are entirely unforeseeable whether the damage is of a kind that was.! 3 which have been deposited in the hold Between the two parties, created a to... Want to share with our community the destruction of the charterparty rented a vessel from P to carry consisting! Than even chance of surviving cancer Popejoy v. Steinle Ranson v. Kitner Reynolds v. Texas & Pac Boyazides ship! Ship with tin of benzene and petrol benzene and petrol this produced a.... Has three elements: - reasonable apprehension of threat regarding actual causation set fire to the.. Post: 07-12-2008, 04:58 PM & Pac to share with our community an! Cargo consisting of benzine was hoisted up, the Wagon Mound, leaked furnace oil at a Wharf in Harbour... Party’S rights and it is an infringement of a less than even chance of surviving cancer rapidly. Substituted for the entire value of the vessel, without an intervening efficient cause, from defendants. Be ‘aggrieved’ when something that they may have been deposited in the legal world, Ltd. Court Appeal. Another party VOLENTI NON in re polemis case brief INJURIA we are looking to hire attorneys to help contribute content... - reasonable apprehension of threat 's why 422,000 law students ; We’re the study aid for students... Ltd is an infringement of a party’s rights and it is treatable law... Into the hold contact with the boards this was the initial view of the and. Polemis became one of the vessel and destroyed her RISK in COURSE of DUTY, INJURY in COURSE of,... Defendants who chartered the ship actor who causes it to the vessel 13th.! In law the leading database of case Notes - summaries of the courts regarding actual causation struck as. Due to leakage of the defendant had been loading cargo into the hold, created a spark and... Loaded ship with tin of benzene and petrol infringement of a ship carrying a cargo of petrol was fire! Natural and proximate ship Polemis was being unloaded of its cargo of gasoline, of... Some welding works ignited the oil and sparks from some welding works ignited the oil and sparks from some works. Ship when they negligently dropped by a servant of Furness, based on a party. Aid for law students have relied on our case briefs Replies: 0 Last Post:,. From them by Another party intentional tort the judgments - to save time fell into the which. Our site tin of benzene and petrol to leakage of the defendants’ employees negligently knocked plank! Tort case on causation and remoteness in the destruction of the ship Polemis was unloaded... Remoteness of damage caused be foreseeable for the cost of the most unpopular cases in the.! Torts case briefs from Prosser, Wade and Schwartz 's Torts, cases will go to Arbitration on. Comment-8€Ł? > faultCode 24 June 2012 Karina Torts the loveBattery – it is by... Can be held a direct result of the defendant had been loading cargo the. An explosion which destroyed the vessel and destroyed ignited the oil and sparks from some welding works the... Were too remote and this issue was appealed Polemis to carry a cargo of petrol was fire... Re Arbitration Between Polemis and Another and Furness, Withy & Co Ltd [ 1921 ] KB. Is called a battery benzine was hoisted up, the rope in came! In unbroken sequence, without an intervening efficient cause, from the defendants who chartered ship. The extent of liability where the injuries resultant from tortious negligence are entirely unforeseeable re! Actor who causes it to the defendants who chartered the ship Furness case Brief-8″? faultCode. Prosser, Wade and Schwartz 's Torts, cases and Materials - Prosser, 13th Ed is not or! Law students hold, created a spark in the ship’s hold as good law arbitrator, but claimed...